A federal court in Illinois entered default judgment against the City of East St. Louis and its city manager Tuesday after finding the defendants engaged in nearly 10 months of willful discovery violations, including...
A state appeals court has revived a disadvantaged-business enterprise's claim that Cardinal Health 110 sabotaged its chance at a subcontract on a state pharmaceutical contract by lying to Illinois about the company's...
A state appeals court has revived a disadvantaged-business enterprise's claim that Cardinal Health 110 sabotaged its chance at a subcontract on a state pharmaceutical contract by lying to Illinois about the company's capabilities.
A state appellate panel reversed a personal injury judgment and remanded for a new trial after finding the trial court improperly instructed the jury on the sudden emergency doctrine.
The First Department on Tuesday affirmed dismissal of a derivative action brought on behalf of Credit Suisse Group AG, rejecting the plaintiff's challenge to a forum non conveniens ruling and finding Switzerland the appropriate venue for claims arising unde...
A federal court in Illinois entered default judgment against the City of East St. Louis and its city manager Tuesday after finding the defendants engaged in nearly 10 months of willful discovery violations, including failing to produce compensation records,...
Senior U.S. District Judge Sim Lake denied a motion to remand, ruling that First National Bank of Giddings acted in bad faith by failing to serve a non-diverse co-defendant to block removal.
A federal judge in Texas ordered Snap Inc. to produce the same documents it provided to Kansas during a parallel jurisdictional probe.
A federal judge in Houston granted Fox Corporation's motion to file portions of an emergency motion under seal and gave the defendant seven days to file a motion justifying why the public's right of access should be overcome.
A federal judge in Tennessee granted adult film producer Strike 3 Holdings’ motion for early discovery but attached a protective order designed to prevent the company from using the threat of unmasking a defendant to force a settlement.
PORTLAND, Maine — A federal magistrate judge ruled that an employer’s routine legal consultations regarding workplace accommodations do not waive attorney-client privilege unless the employer relies on that advice to defend its actions, blocking a plaintiff...
Security officers' overtime claims against the City University of New York were reinstated by the First Department, which held that the FLSA statute of limitations accrues with each paycheck, not on a single date.
A federal judge in San Jose approved an emergency motion allowing a plaintiff to serve an anonymous cryptocurrency fraud defendant by sending a non-fungible token to the defendant's digital wallet addresses.
A Northern District of California magistrate judge ruled that Apple’s product roadmaps do not automatically qualify for the highest level of confidentiality protection, rejecting the company’s attempt to shield strategic planning documents under a "Source C...
A federal magistrate judge on Wednesday narrowed a subpoena xAI served on OpenAI, limiting the scope of documents the AI company must produce regarding its hiring of former xAI employee Xuechen Li, who is accused of stealing trade secrets.
A federal judge in New Jersey dismissed a Delaware casino from a wrongful death suit, ruling that the casino lacked sufficient contacts with the state to be subject to personal jurisdiction there.
A federal judge in South Dakota rejected a hotel chain’s attempt to revisit a prior order finding that Native American plaintiffs had standing to sue for racial discrimination under a federal civil rights statute.
A Washington federal court ruled that an insurer failed to overcome the presumption of no attorney-client privilege in a bad-faith dispute, ordering the production of its entire claim file.
A federal judge in Nashville denied a preliminary injunction in a systemic foster-care lawsuit, ruling that the named plaintiffs failed to prove imminent irreparable harm despite evidence of past constitutional violations.
A federal magistrate judge in New Mexico denied a motion for default judgment as a sanction for spoliation, ruling that creating witness statements and coordinating testimony after a lawsuit was filed does not constitute the bad faith required for severe sa...
A federal judge in Louisiana ruled that a state statute creates an implied private right of action for homeowners suing mortgage servicers over interest payments, but dismissed Jared Hotard’s case because he failed to allege specific damages to establish st...
Three nationwide shareholder derivative lawsuits alleging insider trading and false statements regarding Fiserv Inc.’s Clover product will be consolidated into a single lead case in the Eastern District of Wisconsin.